On 12.1.16 9:47, Toralf Förster wrote: > On 01/12/2016 05:35 AM, Tim Wilson-Brown - teor wrote: >> If you run an under-utilised exit, we encourage you to opt-in as a >> fallback directory. >> We've also fixed a major bug that excluded some relays from the list. > > Well, I to amintain an exit with 8 MB advised bandwith, utilized currently by > 50%: > > https://globe.torproject.org/#/relay/F1BE15429B3CE696D6807F4D4A58B1BFEC45C822 > > Anything I should add to my torrc ?
Not unless your server is bottlenecking your node, such as insufficient RAM, or one thread being maxed out. Right now, most exit nodes are being utilized ~50% of their advertised bandwidth capacity because that is the overall usage of the Tor exit network. So, if your exit node is using <50% of all it's performance power (such as CPU, bandwidth, RAM, etc.), then I'd say it's currently being under-utilized and would qualify for the fallback directory opt-in (and if the other criteria are met), should you so choose. On the flip side, if your node is using ~50% of it's advertised bandwidth and is using 80% of it's CPU power or actual bandwidth to do so, that's a misconfiguration and not a good candidate for a fallback directory. _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
