> On 15 Dec 2015, at 13:12, Nima Fatemi <n...@riseup.net> wrote: > > Roger Dingledine: >> We should somehow teach everybody that losing their flags for a few days >> is totally fine and normal, and even something to be proud of because >> you took a useful step at keeping your Tor relay safe and secure > > Maybe we should introduce a new flag for the relays that are running the > cutting edge version of Tor?
There's a startup warning for this: it says your relay version is "too new". > And another one for long-time relays. say, if a relay has been in the > consensus, it would get an special flag of some sort… At some point, we'd like to make long-term relays fallback directory mirrors. That's not a flag, but it is a special kind of status. Also, isn't this the kind of thing that tor-roster does? I think these kinds of features would be better there, rather than cluttering up the consensus. Tim Tim Wilson-Brown (teor) teor2345 at gmail dot com PGP 968F094B teor at blah dot im OTR CAD08081 9755866D 89E2A06F E3558B7F B5A9D14F
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
