> On 1 Oct 2015, at 14:33, Dhalgren Tor <dhalgren....@gmail.com> wrote: > > Have a new exit running in an excellent network on a very fast server > with AES-NI. Server plan is limited to100TB so have set a limit > slightly above this (18000000 bytes/sec) thinking that bandwidth would > run 80-90% of the maximum and average to just below the plan limit.
How did you set this limit? What did you write in your torrc file? > After three days the assigned bandwidth for the relay is going up > instead of moderating--looks like the measurement system has a problem > in this case. Just dropped the limit to 16500000 to stay below 100TB > with maximum load. > > A good number appears to be around 65000 to 70000, but 98000 was just > assigned. > > What can be done to extract proper rating from measurement system? > Tried setting TokenBucketRefillInterval to 10 milliseconds for more > exact control but this has not helped. Should an IPTABLES > packet-dropping limit be established? Can the rating system be fixed? > _______________________________________________ > tor-relays mailing list > tor-relays@lists.torproject.org > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays Tim Wilson-Brown (teor) teor2345 at gmail dot com PGP 968F094B teor at blah dot im OTR CAD08081 9755866D 89E2A06F E3558B7F B5A9D14F
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
