Hi all,

thanks for your answer and the point to the BwAuth specs, Tom - I’ll definitely 
get into that, or at least try to.

The proposal sounds interesting and I think it would be a good thing to have 
the whole voting mechanism a bit more transparent. But I guess that might not 
happen in the near future as it seems to require some bit of work at the 
back-end…

On 01.06.2015, at 18:56, torelay <tore...@ruggedinbox.com> wrote:
> I set my bridge up using the guide at https://www.sky-ip.org/tutorials.html 
> <https://www.sky-ip.org/tutorials.html> and I have a steady flow of 
> connections definitely visible via tor-arm. 

Thanks for the suggestion! I checked my setup with the tutorial and while I 
didn’t know that one, I did everything shown there when I was originally 
setting up the relay. So unfortunately, that doesn’t solve my problem :(

Meanwhile, my consensus weight increased again and I’m now at about the level I 
was two weeks ago. So maybe Nick was right when he said

> Right now, if you want to know the reason why your server was listed a 
> certain way in the Tor directory, the following steps are recommended:
> - Wait a while, see if things get better.

:)

Best regards,
Jannis
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Reply via email to