On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 08:47:56PM +0000, nusenu wrote: > sounds alarming if people operating tor's key infrastructure do not > care (or have not enough time to care)
Well, we are working on a variety of approaches now for fixing it. Some in the short term (get more bwauths, fix bugs), some in the long term (make and deploy better design for computing weights). > https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-consensus-health/2015-May/005774.html: > > WARNING: The following directory authorities are not reporting > > bandwidth scanner results: tor26 > > If one more bw auth goes down, all relays will get the unmeasured > flag, because the threshold of 3 votes is no longer reached, is that > understanding of the spec correct? No, I believe if there are only two dir auths who express weight opinions in their votes, then the group collectively backs off to using self-advertised weights. > current stats: > 2015-05-19 19:00: 1367 unmeasured > ("lost" ~1000 relays and 10GBit/s bw since 2015-05-01) We also took some steps in the past few weeks to cut out extra tiny relays. It would be good for somebody to track a list of what those events were. I don't mean to say that we lost zero relays due to the above issue; but I think an unknown number of them are better explained by other events in the network. --Roger _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
