Also i guess its high time that TOR network starts thinking about folks like us with low bandwidth.
I am in as well for devoting my time for any help required > Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 19:21:49 +0200 > From: toralf.foers...@gmx.de > To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org > Subject: Re: [tor-relays] GoodBadISPs revamp? > > On 10/13/2014 02:56 AM, subk...@riseup.net wrote: > > should the community start a revamp project (or start a whole new list)? > > i'd be willing to donate my time to help get this started if need be. > > There's no good/bad ISP in my opinion, there're just ISs who forbid exit > nodes by their terms and conditions or not. > All others is in the eye of the beholder. > > I do have a nifty example to illustrate it, a response of a german ISP > (language is german, no translation needed !): > > Guten Tag Herr Förster, > > laut Deutschem Recht sind Tor Server im Moment nicht verboten. > Aus diesem Grund sind Tor Server bei uns auch nicht verboten. > Aus Erfahrung raten wir jedoch vom Betrieb eines Tor Exit Node ab. > Leider wird oft ueber Tor Server Content verbreitet welcher laut > Deutschem Recht > nicht erlaubt ist. Dies kann Ermittlungen von Behoerden nach sich > ziehen. > > Do you see it ? > > The welcome contains the german unlaut "ö" - the Text itself not, all german > umlauts arre replaced with the appropriate "ae", "oe" and "ue". Among many > technical explanations, could this mean by any chance, that the writers > opinion differ from the (got from outside ?) official response ? > > -- > Toralf > pgp key: 0076 E94E > > _______________________________________________ > tor-relays mailing list > tor-relays@lists.torproject.org > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
