still "hibernating", BUT ... bandwidth went up like crazy ! 2014-10-11 2:57 GMT-04:00 Blaise Gagnon <quebecf...@gmail.com>:
> and ... what is "hibernating" ? > > 2014-10-11 2:55 GMT-04:00 Blaise Gagnon <quebecf...@gmail.com>: > > OK I've set MaxAdvertisedBandwidth, but I did set it in the past, with no >> results .... >> >> Anything else beside running multiple relays ? >> >> Many many thanks again ! >> >> 2014-10-11 2:48 GMT-04:00 Matthew Finkel <matthew.fin...@gmail.com>: >> >> On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 02:05:24AM -0400, Blaise Gagnon wrote: >>> > Hi and many thanks for developping this project ! >>> > >>> > I have a dedicated 200Mb (25 MB) fiber optics connection and a >>> dedicated >>> > quad-core Linux server (64). What is the best setup to get maximum >>> > bandwidth usage ? I'm still stuck at 46.4Kb measured speed and 3,51MB >>> > advertised bandwidth. The server has direct connection to the Internet. >>> > >>> > Fingerprint : 5EF740BB88C75915F8316DFEC8F1C8631FF26F12 >>> > >>> >>> Hi Blaise, >>> >>> Thanks for running a relay! >>> >>> It looks like you're currently peaking at a little over 2MB (with a >>> mean of ~1MB)[0][1]. >>> >>> I also see that the relay is currently hibernating. This will >>> certainly impact the amount of bandwidth you use. Did you configure >>> MaxAdvertisedBandwidth? >>> >>> Below is what the network knows about your relay (with some irrelevant >>> details removed). >>> >>> $ curl >>> https://onionoo.torproject.org/details?fingerprint=5EF740BB88C75915F8316DFEC8F1C8631FF26F12 >>> { >>> "version":"1.1", >>> "relays_published":"2014-10-11 05:00:00", >>> "relays":[ >>> { >>> "nickname":"QuebecFibe", >>> "fingerprint":"5EF740BB88C75915F8316DFEC8F1C8631FF26F12", >>> [...] >>> "last_seen":"2014-10-11 06:00:00", >>> "last_changed_address_or_port":"2014-10-07 07:00:00", >>> "first_seen":"2014-07-17 17:00:00", >>> "running":true, >>> "flags":["Fast","Running","V2Dir","Valid"], >>> [...] >>> "consensus_weight":5950, >>> "host_name":"69.159.127.80", >>> "last_restarted":"2014-10-08 06:31:26", >>> "bandwidth_rate":26214400, >>> "bandwidth_burst":26214400, >>> "observed_bandwidth":3512594, >>> "advertised_bandwidth":3512594, >>> "exit_policy":["reject *:*"], >>> "exit_policy_summary":{"reject":["1-65535"]}, >>> [...] >>> "advertised_bandwidth_fraction":2.777751E-4, >>> "consensus_weight_fraction":2.4263727E-4, >>> "guard_probability":0.0, >>> "middle_probability":7.2791905E-4, >>> "exit_probability":0.0, >>> "recommended_version":true, >>> "hibernating":true} >>> ], >>> [...] >>> ]} >>> >>> [0] >>> https://globe.torproject.org/#/relay/5EF740BB88C75915F8316DFEC8F1C8631FF26F12 >>> [1] >>> https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/5EF740BB88C75915F8316DFEC8F1C8631FF26F12 >>> >>> > Should I run multiple relays on the same machine/IP ? >>> >>> You can, and it may help, but there may be a simpler problem that can >>> be fixed here. >>> >>> - Matt >>> _______________________________________________ >>> tor-relays mailing list >>> tor-relays@lists.torproject.org >>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays >>> >> >> >
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
