Thanks. At least it is good to see the graph stabilizing a bit after the sudden drop.
-kali- > On Monday, August 25, 2014 12:31 PM, George Kadianakis <desnac...@riseup.net> > wrote: > > Kali Tor <kalito...@yahoo.com> writes: > >> I wonder why there is a sudden decrease in number of Guard nodes? >> >> -kali- >> > > Because of the guard security changes that are currently being > conducted, and specifically this section of proposal 236: > https://gitweb.torproject.org/torspec.git/blob/38e1ccdecac69be6651fc6d0ffb0b7c0f68ae3ed:/proposals/236-single-guard-node.txt#l145 > > Please read this paper for more information: > https://www.petsymposium.org/2014/papers/Dingledine.pdf > >> >>> On Wednesday, August 20, 2014 5:40 PM, "Sebastian G. > <bastik.tor>" <bastik....@googlemail.com> wrote: >>> > 20.08.2014, 19:23 Nusenu: >>>> its done >>>> >>>> https://metrics.torproject.org/network.html#relayflags >>>> >>> >>> and by the looks of it, it didn't have much impact on the bandwidth >>> >>> https://metrics.torproject.org/bandwidth.html#bwhist-flags >>> >>> https://metrics.torproject.org/bandwidth.html#bandwidth-flags >>> > > Yes, it seems so. You can read some analysis on this here: > https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/2014-March/006458.html > > _______________________________________________ > tor-relays mailing list > tor-relays@lists.torproject.org > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays > _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
