If you look at #2 here: https://metrics.torproject.org/relay-search.html?search=72227B12964210DE79DD6413AF8BB39DE93C4C8C it says "Unmeasured=1". #1 does not have that. So I guess the dirauths have not gotten around to measure the real bandwidth of #2. It's still in "phase one" or "phase two" according to https://blog.torproject.org/blog/lifecycle-of-a-new-relay
On 2013-09-18 20:59, Christian Dietrich wrote: > Yep,weird. I've installed both at the same time, on an clean ubuntu > out-of-the box system > at 2013-09-11. As you can see at atlas.torproject.org #1 has been > started at 2013-09-11 08:40:17 > and #2 at 2013-09-11 08:40:17. > > @Mick: This will be solved at next restart, but i don't think the > problem is caused by missing nodefamily. _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
