-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Kostas Jakeliunas: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Moritz Bartl > <mor...@torservers.net> wrote: > >> On 13.08.2013 08:02, Kali Tor wrote: >>> I am actually in double minds about using obsproxy. Is there a >>> demand >> for it? >> >> Yes! Please do set up obfsproxy. > > > Since obfsproxy bridges are usually really low traffic, I think > the combination of an obfsproxy bridge and raspberrypi makes quite > a bit of sense (that's what I'm running in any case, no problems so > far (I also had to compile Tor for armv6 from source)) :)
I'm curious about this: since it appears the Great Firewall of China blocks (IP, port) tuples - is there any reason *not* to run a non-obfsproxy port on a bridge that is also running obfsproxy? Currently on one of my bridges I run all three - the normal bridge protocol, obfs2 and obfs3 on different ports. Best, - -Gordon M. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJSCkwEAAoJED/jpRoe7/ujLuQH/iIiuoVdhSZuYol5s+8PEBA5 tpCUgVRxlW+5lBzDd1XRuM9BC/qQo0ocfMTAXtGv8frBPD9LL5GvIRhAiuAsoiow CMQXIDrqNkvLSyP3q/IEjLs2uVInFnMkjuNASe9goruZo7Pcl7mlpV1JVf+uyuTi l901xJVIcx6B42ewQAbOQ+V+jsqcWfvy2jMW4lxUZpMgW/gaN4w+1Mvq7VQYocab KQyxz5omla5xOVOsUqA0erjd5jFr7+Mdq+/b+WgVJD1Co4Mkd31r+X9QEpxr1H1Y BZ7fcA+SVC83RqK5YVMLsBiXmqkOp4rtKyQdCzV+94fSoGze95aOTGLZaj4Uv0Q= =ncak -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
