I'm currently trying to build a network on Brazil. The main problem is to get a fast network link. Telecoms brought out shitty infrastructure and high "combo deal prices". But I hope that bringing up more nodes should attenuate the issue. At least for web browsing.
-- Luther Blisset GNUPG/PGP KEY: 6722CF80 I challenge you to play the game in which there is no loser but everything is fun and worthwhile!
--- Begin Message ---On Thu, 18 Jul 2013 10:49:46 -0400 Tom Ritter <t...@ritter.vg> allegedly wrote: > Sending this out, as I suspect I am not the only person running a node > on SiteValley, as they have pretty good bandwidth for pretty cheap. > > I had inquired in the beginning if they allowed Tor, and they said > yes, but if we get too many abuse complaints we'll shut it down. So > maybe 4 or 5 abuse complaints later they did indeed give me the > ultimatum to shut it down or get shut down. So I made them give me a > new IP address, and made it into a middle node. (The new IP was > because I was thinking of making it a bridge.) Hmm. Pretty crummy AUP. And /very/ crummy treatment of a customer. I wonder if we are going to see more of this sort of thing now. I think the tor network needs greater geographic diversity. Mick --------------------------------------------------------------------- Mick Morgan gpg fingerprint: FC23 3338 F664 5E66 876B 72C0 0A1F E60B 5BAD D312 http://baldric.net ---------------------------------------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
--- End Message ---
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
