On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 11:43:22AM +0200, Eugen Leitl wrote: > What constitutes a minimal useful exit policy? Mine is curently > > reject 0.0.0.0/8:* > reject 169.254.0.0/16:* > reject 127.0.0.0/8:* > reject 192.168.0.0/16:* > reject 10.0.0.0/8:* > reject 172.16.0.0/12:* > reject 78.46.119.2:* > accept *:22 > accept *:443 > accept *:465 > accept *:563 > accept *:992-995 > reject *:* > > which doesn't give me any complaints, but also no exit > flag. On the other hand I would love to unthrottle it > (this is a dual-core Atom, but on 1 GBit line) as > long as someone pays for the extra traffic (this is > 6.9 EUR/TByte).
6.9 EUR * 30 TB is quite pricy. At the current plan, we could pay for part of it, but we'd hope you, or the community around you, can pay for the other part. > I think there are several people in my position. So > > a) what minimal exit policy would qualify us for applying for funding? accept *:80 accept *:443 accept *:554 accept *:1755 That also happens to be enough to get you the Exit flag. > b) when and who is the contact? Should I just talk to Zwiebelfreunde e.V.? The contact for what? I've been coordinating potential exit relay operators so far. Once things are up and running a bit more, I'm hoping Tor can contract part-time to somebody and I'll hand everything to him/her to keep it all going. --Roger _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
