On 2021-11-18 9:54 am, Simon Opper wrote:
Thanks Holger
All good Re the design of the tagger. Makes sense.
Regarding the auto-generated proxy taxonomy you mentioned, we utilise
proxying graph loading methods now too. In our process, I would
configure a new "managed graph" via our manifest loader that proxies
the global taxonomy in a new taxonomy that stores the dash hidden
triples as you also suggest. This would require the additional graph
management setup in our method which is fine but I wonder if you mean
there is another in-built or sparql/dash/swp EDG method?
No, we don't have anything automated for that.
Cheers
Holger
If you're envisaged process uses a different mechanism it would be
good to know more.
Cheers mate
Simon
On Wednesday, November 17, 2021 at 7:41:44 PM UTC+11 Holger Knublauch
wrote:
Hi Simon,
I think the behavior that you describe works as-designed. The tag
set graph is only supposed to contain the mappings, while the
display of the tags queries the taxonomy only and therefore won't
see any dash:hidden triples that you may have "smuggled" into the
tag set graph. (Pro tip: you can actually see which graph the Add
Tags panel queries if you look at the Network monitor of Chrome's
dev tools - that's not the union of all graphs).
The only solution that I see is to create another intermediate
Taxonomy that includes/owl:imports the original Taxonomy but adds
the dash:hidden triples that you need here. Such an
intermediate/proxy taxonomy could potentially be auto-generated.
Holger
On 2021-11-17 1:35 pm, Simon Opper wrote:
Hi all
In a tagset I want to hide certain skos resources , primarily
conceptschemes, but it appears that the code that renders the
tagger panel does not respect dash:hidden in all cases.
It looks there are two behaviours occurring:
1. if the scheme is declared as hidden in the included source
taxonomy -> it is hidden in the tagger panel
2. if the scheme is declared hidden in the tagset graph -> the
panel _does not_ respect this and still shows the scheme.
Is this intended ?
behaviour 1. does not give me the desired solution as I wish to
hide certain schemes _only_ in the tagset and I do not want to
declare it as hidden in the source taxonomy.
is there a workaround ?
local hidden not respected.png
included hidden is repected.png
Many thanks in advance
Cheers
Simon
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Google Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/ea405382-79ec-4ccc-95bd-336d362d8346n%40googlegroups.com
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/ea405382-79ec-4ccc-95bd-336d362d8346n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/b942ac7f-754d-4880-9519-aa9df0d3a5f1n%40googlegroups.com
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/b942ac7f-754d-4880-9519-aa9df0d3a5f1n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid
Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/d0bd78dc-41bf-e227-55a7-db31e688d51a%40topquadrant.com.
