Hi Matt,

I need to ask a colleague and we'll get back to you. Meanwhile, looking at the source code, it seems that ?facetFilters can be a resource that is the subject of

    http://topbraid.org/saf/appliedfacet

and you can see low-level details of how those values are constructed from saf.ui.ttlx -> saf:buildAppliedFacetList

Holger


On 2021-08-03 10:34 pm, Matt Goldberg wrote:
That works, thanks.

What is the correct syntax for the facet filters? I haven't been able to find any examples anywhere.

On Mon, Aug 2, 2021, 8:23 PM Holger Knublauch <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    I suspect you need to now provide a forth variable on the right
    hand side, e.g.

        ("term" ?facetFilters 0 100 false) smf:luceneQuery (?result
    ?score ?total ?homeGraph)

    Holger


    On 2021-08-03 2:14 am, Matt Goldberg wrote:
    Hello-

    I had been successfully using smf:luceneQuery before upgrading to
    EDG 7. If I run the example query you provided earlier in this thread

    SELECT ?result ?score ?total
    WHERE {
       ("term" ?facetFilters 0 100 false) smf:luceneQuery (?result
    ?score ?total)
    }

    in EDG or TBC 6.3.2, it works fine. If I run the same query in
    EDG/TBC 7.0.3, I get the following error:
    Failed to execute SPARQL request:
    java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 3 out of bounds for
    length 3

    Any ideas why this might be happening?
    Thanks.

    On Tuesday, November 10, 2020 at 7:20:12 PM UTC-5 Matt Goldberg
    wrote:

        There's a few use cases we're looking at. At the moment, the
        primary use case involves a proof of concept regarding a
        global search that federates a free text query. We have some
        other systems that also support Lucene, so the idea is that
        at least all the basic operators would work (at least *, ?,
        OR, AND, NOT) to provide moderately consistent performance
        across systems. I wrote a SWP service that uses
        smf:luceneQuery, which does work nicely in terms of the query
        itself, but it does run into the challenges you mentioned above.

        On Tuesday, November 10, 2020 at 5:24:56 PM UTC-5 Holger
        Knublauch wrote:

            I guess that's true. Due to the nature of the "normal"
            requirements that this feature is used for, it will take
            the input string and post-process it beyond recognition,
            for example to inject the names of the target graphs, to
            split multiple words into AND and to wrap each term with
            * ... *. However, you can use OR in between words.

            What operators in particular do you need?

            Holger


            On 11/11/2020 3:27 AM, Matt Goldberg wrote:
            Hello-

            Is it true that textindex:query magic property cannot
            support the Lucene operators?

            Thanks.

            On Friday, November 6, 2020 at 1:06:59 PM UTC-5 Matt
            Goldberg wrote:

                Thanks for the heads up. I'll continue experimenting.

                On Thursday, November 5, 2020 at 6:49:55 PM UTC-5
                Holger Knublauch wrote:

                    Hi Matt,

                    smf:luceneQuery is in fact the magic property
                    that Search the EDG is using, but without
                    knowing more about your specific use case I
                    would say 'use with caution' as the magic
                    property is really meant for use with in SWP and
                    has some quirks.

                    For example, the user must define a limit,
                    facets are kind of a pain to pass through,
                    target graphs must opt in, working copies are
                    out of scope, and lastly all graphs in the index
                    are queried - the only way to narrow the scope
                    is by providing a graph facet.

                    But generally speaking this should work
                    (params are: search term, facets, offset, limit,
                    advanced syntax (when true the magic property
                    will use the input verbatim, essentially
                    allowing lucene operands to be utilized)

                    SELECT ?result ?score ?total
                    WHERE {
                       ("term" ?facetFilters 0 100 false)
                    smf:luceneQuery (?result ?score ?total)
                    }

                    If the user needs facets, we'd have to work up a
                    more thorough example, which would involve temp
                    graphs.

                    So the alternative would be to use the
                    textindex:query magic property while iterating
                    over the properties of interest.

                    Holger


                    On 11/6/2020 12:12 AM, Matt Goldberg wrote:
                    That magic property requires a specific
                    property to search values of, which is not
                    quite what I want at the moment. After digging
                    some more, I found smf:luceneQuery which
                    appears to return similar results to Search the
                    EDG. Is there any caveats with using this magic
                    property?

                    On Wednesday, November 4, 2020 at 6:04:54 PM
                    UTC-5 Holger Knublauch wrote:

                        Hi Matt,

                        yes there are functions in the textindex
                        namespace (http://topbraid.org/textindex#
                        <http://topbraid.org/textindex#>)

                        Open the file \server.topbraidlive.org
                        
<http://server.topbraidlive.org>\web\2018\textindex.ui.ttlx
                        in TBC to see their declarations.

                        The name of the index for EDG vocabularies
                        is "teamwork" - see the Text Indices admin
                        page.

                        An example call would be

                            ("teamwork" rdfs:comment "hello")
                        textindex:query (?subject ?score ?literal
                        ?graph)

                        If you have follow-up questions, please ask
                        here.

                        Holger


                        On 11/5/2020 8:17 AM, Matt Goldberg wrote:
                        Hello-

                        Is there a mechanism like a magic property
                        to query the freetext index from SPARQL? I
                        didn't see one mentioned in the TopBraid
                        documentation. I've used some other
                        systems that have this feature.

                        Thanks.
-- You received this message because you are
                        subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid
                        Suite Users" group.
                        To unsubscribe from this group and stop
                        receiving emails from it, send an email to
                        [email protected].
                        To view this discussion on the web visit
                        
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/ac42f5bc-323f-4254-8027-20e166d9e264n%40googlegroups.com
                        
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/ac42f5bc-323f-4254-8027-20e166d9e264n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

-- You received this message because you are
                    subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid Suite
                    Users" group.
                    To unsubscribe from this group and stop
                    receiving emails from it, send an email to
                    [email protected].
                    To view this discussion on the web visit
                    
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/59e998be-8c2c-4e47-82e2-e9948acaa846n%40googlegroups.com
                    
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/59e998be-8c2c-4e47-82e2-e9948acaa846n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

-- You received this message because you are subscribed to
            the Google Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group.
            To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails
            from it, send an email to [email protected].
            To view this discussion on the web visit
            
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/e8a7ccb2-bf2f-4d16-a550-dcd6bb65c27fn%40googlegroups.com
            
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/e8a7ccb2-bf2f-4d16-a550-dcd6bb65c27fn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the
    Google Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group.
    To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
    send an email to [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>.
    To view this discussion on the web visit
    
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/b1757d75-60c2-4b8f-b74d-d40baffa249cn%40googlegroups.com
    
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/b1757d75-60c2-4b8f-b74d-d40baffa249cn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
    Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group.
    To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
    send an email to [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>.
    To view this discussion on the web visit
    
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/fcebb9cb-e3bd-0355-e5b1-7f56f60e254f%40topquadrant.com
    
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/fcebb9cb-e3bd-0355-e5b1-7f56f60e254f%40topquadrant.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/CAGyojU2oPOiHobCR7%2BH8vOvstA4SVz1gq9xsCAZfN3JWSgnX%3DQ%40mail.gmail.com <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/CAGyojU2oPOiHobCR7%2BH8vOvstA4SVz1gq9xsCAZfN3JWSgnX%3DQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid 
Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/931162d7-33d0-63a7-1d97-32cdca96d5b8%40topquadrant.com.

Reply via email to