Hi folks I want to encode relationships between two list of things, a list of agencies and a list of functions. The relationships are defined in a third list.
As one outcome, I also want to test the ability of Maui to attribute relationships. I think it will be poor but I want to confirm. A tagset doesn't work out of the box as it just has one list of things that can be tagged with something. I could either tag agencies with a relationship... but to what. Or the agency to a function, but only with a single tag predicate e.g skos:related. So I still then have to attribute the relationships somehow. A crosswalk doesn't work out of the box as while you can have both the set of agencies and the functions, it only allows a single match predicate e.g. crosswlk:closeMatch and I want to be able to select from a range of possible match predicates. So I can obviously work through this through in an ontology or manual code editing manner to derive such relations but I'm hoping that I can leverage the existing asset interfaces and maui: can the tagger can be adapted to enable a dynamic set of tag predicates and not just a single skos property for example. possibly a shacl shape or rule. Before I try this I just wanted to see if the tagger interface and maui would still work ? and/or could the crosswalks asset be customised in a similar manner to allow a dynamic list of match predicates ? Many thanks in advance Simon -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/5b2daa7b-9542-40f7-b65e-56c50bf4f70bn%40googlegroups.com.
