To add to and refocus this issue: 1) We can extract tag triples from reified and qualified tagging data - but its not obvious whats the best way to make the annotations on reified statements visible in EDG - brute force via a DataGraph or custom SWP are possible, but maybe there is some thought and/or capability in place for this already?
2) Could workflows be used to do this? 3) Is there an RDF* capability in the UI we could/should be using? On Wednesday, July 1, 2020 at 10:54:58 AM UTC+10 simon...@surroundaustralia.com wrote: > Hi there > > We're continuing to develop a workflow for assessing, reviewing and down > selecting sets of tags into final tags and tag sets e.g. for developing a > training set and running the tagger on a verified subset set of tags. > > I'm after some guidance on how to track metadata about tags. > > The tagger editor (EDG 6.3) only seems to like tags in the form > > <http://data.surroundaustralia.com/dataset/wiringrules/section/1.5.11.3> > corpus:topic < > http://data.surroundaustralia.com/dataset/sa_wr_section_taxonomy_concepts/arm's_reach> > > . > > If you alter this triple set it no longer shows in the source code or as a > tag against a corpus document. There is obviously a shape for the tags view > and editor I assume. > > I've tried a few things such as adding blank nodes to the triple or > reifying the statement > > e.g. > > < > https://data.surroundaustralia.com/dataset/annotations#arms_reach_tag_metadata > > > rdfs:label "arms reach tag metadata" ; > rdf:type rdf:Statement ; > rdf:subject sec:1.5.11.3 ; > rdf:predicate corpus:topic ; > rdf:object < > http://data.surroundaustralia.com/dataset/sa_wr_section_taxonomy_concepts/arm's_reach> > > . > > But it still disappears from the tag editor EDG view of things. > > So the question is; > Is the following approach best or is there another solution ? > > 1. Store the tag along with metadata about it's usage and status in > another graph e.g. datagraph; and > 2. use a rule/transform, insert/update only the clean tag triples from > the above into the tagset graph > > P.s. i posted a couple of weeks ago about being able to view all the > tags "attached" to a document. Note this is distinct from viewing the > available tags. Irene provided a reply (belated thanks Irene), however it > doesn't solve the issue. > > I'm still looking to be able to see the tags that are "attached" to > documents. Not just the available tags as Irene highlighted. > > Currently I have to do this in a separate datagraph but I would prefer to > work in the tag set editor itself. > > Any guidance on this would be great. > > Cheers > > Simon > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/c4cd9d42-30c4-4255-aad1-3ada7a86c58bn%40googlegroups.com.
