Thanks Frank
These numbers speak volumes:
14 55
15 47
16 5
I've seen you here many times :
http://www.reversebeacon.net/dxsd1/dxsd1.php?f=3
But I never heard it even once ..
For all my CQ WW I don't remember such weak conditions ( (towards NA).
---
Nick, UY0ZG
http://www.topband.in.ua
[email protected] писал 2020-12-02 09:29:
Hi Nick,
W3LPL was multi-single, we spent very limited time
on Topband except to chase multipliers.
We worked 160 QSOs, 21 Zones and 70 countries on Topband
Conditions appeared to be normal to Europe but poor
on paths crossing the auroral zone such as Zone 16
There was significantly less Topband activity than in recent years,
perhaps because both 80 and 40 meters were excellent all night.
Zone QSOs01 1 02 1
03 1 04 16
05 12
06 1
07 2
08 6
09 4
10 1 11 1
13 1
14 55 15 47 16 5 20 4
21 1
31 1 33 4 35 2 40 1
73
Frank
W3LPL
-------------------------
FROM: "uy0zg" <[email protected]>
TO: [email protected]
CC: [email protected], "Topband"
<[email protected]>
SENT: Tuesday, December 1, 2020 6:32:05 PM
SUBJECT: Re: Topband: FW: CQWW a bust this year
Hi
Frank
May I ask how many QSOs with zone 16 did you have on 160 meters in
this
CQ WW ?
---
Nick, UY0ZG
http://www.topband.in.ua
[email protected] писал 2020-12-01 20:20:
Of course Lee is absolutely correct.
Many 160 DXers who have had difficulty with receiving antennas
have given up too easily during the troubleshooting process.
73
Frank
W3LPL
Topband Reflector
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
