Hmmm, Nick, I beg to differ with you. I don’t care about scores or countries, zones worked but I do care about 160 meter receiving antennas. In my opinion your statement is dead wrong. Not looking for a war of words or any more discussion. I will not respond again about this.
Lee K7TJR Hi-Z Antennas -----Original Message----- From: Topband <[email protected]> On Behalf Of uy0zg Sent: Tuesday, December 1, 2020 7:10 AM To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected]; Topband <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Topband: CQWW a bust this year Dr Peter Super RX antennas for 160 m do not exist! Exist : - good conditions - Quiet countryside - Geography Does not exist : - Miracles ____________________________ I never envy. They envy me! In CQ WW I only heard three from the USA - K7GM, W1KM, W3UA. These are honest QSOs. --- Nick, UY0ZG http://www.topband.in.ua [email protected] писал 2020-12-01 16:38: > It´s amazing, the probably envious stations always suspect others with > their better antennas and perhaps better operation to use web sdr. > > 73 > Peter > > -----Original Message----- > From: Topband > [mailto:[email protected]] > On > Behalf Of uy0zg > Sent: Dienstag, 1. Dezember 2020 14:19 > To: Tom | SP5XO > Cc: [email protected]; Topband > Subject: Re: Topband: CQWW a bust this year > > Hi > > Weeks conditions ? > > For the best of the ex USSR countries, this is not a problem! > > > Very good HIGH + WEB SDR+ very kind and democratic American judges = > > > super result is ready! > > http://lists.contesting.com/archives//html/3830/2020-11/msg08693.html > > > ......... > > 73 ! > > --- > Nick, UY0ZG > http://www.topband.in.ua > > Tom | SP5XO ????? 2020-12-01 14:21: >> Compare to recent weeks conditions were marginal during CQWW. Only >> two Zone >> 4 stations were audible here and it took long time to work them. >> Whereas a >> week ago band was wide open from MI, IL to CO or even down to TX. >> I worked only mults and Dx's this time. Only 13 stations from Zone 5 >> in my log. Except for VY2ZM all NA's were weak including KC1XX and >> W3LPL! >> Hopeful things improve for next weekend and will work some more in >> ARRL 160. >> CU >> Tom >> sp5xo >> >> Conditions certainly didn't favor 160 over the weekend CQWW contest >> here in >>> Florida at least. >>> >>> Looking back in 2019 I worked 50 countries on 160 during CQWW, this >>> year it was only 17, only 3 Europeans and those were very weak. I'm >>> sure the lack of expeditions due to CV-19 played a part but on whole >>> I think many guys in hindsight will be glad they didn't spend the >>> money to go. >>> >>> Maybe things will pick up next weekend for the ARRL 160 test though >>> that tends to be largely a USA to USA test and it is hard to hear >>> the DX through the local mob >>> >>> CU guys in the pile up >>> >>> Dave >>> NR1DX >>> -- >>> Dave [email protected] www.ArtekManuals.com >>> >>> >>> >> _________________ >> Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband >> Reflector > _________________ > Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband > Reflector > > _________________ > Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband > Reflector _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
