>So, now we're (apparently) recommending he cut back his already minimal radial field..uhhh, really Wes?
I agree with Wes' assessment -- as well as him questioning why Rr would increase with an increased number of radials. If Rr is changing significantly with the increase, then something else is perturbing the measurement. Wes cut his radial length to match the vertical L section height (see N6LF reference). He didn't reduce the number of radials. Paul, W9AC _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
