Mike, One thing that I used to do is put a 80M trap between the top of the vertical and the L wire to use it on two bands. I know yours is not guyed and can’t support top weight. Mine was the same; here is how I approached it.
If two supports are available, in my case a high tower support and a lower tree support, I run the wire sloping down rom the high support to a bit past the vertical, insulate it, and then run rope to the lower support so the wire is secure on its own. I then attach a floating wire from the top of the vertical up to the L wire. No torque on the vertical, in fact, it is even a bit held in place. Of course, you need to lower the wire to fold over the vertical, but that is easily done. Just a thought if you happen to have the needed supports. 73, Drew K3PA ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 23:33:41 -0700 From: W0MU Mike Fatchett <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Subject: Topband: 160 vertical/L Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed I have a full sized 80m vertical and a Top loaded Cushcraft 33ft vertical for 160. The Cushcraft gets out but not great. I was thinking about using an inverted L over the radial field that I use for the 160. It is 30ish radials of various lengths or I have seen where people have loaded the 80m vertical on 160. I think I recall people are not overly excited about bottom loading the 80. The 80 is unguyed so the top cannot support anything. I can get the vertical part of the L up 50-60 feet. Any feelings one way or another? I can make a switching system for the 80 vert if people think this is a reasonable transmitting solution. I have a rcv array, so I am hoping to improve my xmit signal. W0MU ------------------------------ *********************************** _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
