Is there any preferred method to allow an easy choice of multiple main and auxiliary antennas when using the phasing unit?
I never quite figured that out with the 1026. I envision ending up with something resembling a CATV headend. 73 Art ᐧ On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 7:36 PM, Herbert Schoenbohm < [email protected]> wrote: > I did reverse cables constantly on the MFJ but the operations was always > troublesome and time consuming with the 1026. The DXE NCC-1 operation is > smooth and with the large phasing know obtaining nulls on much more > reliable. From what Ii have been to do with two major DX-peditions on 160 > in phasing RX Beverages to me there is no comparison. Although the NCC-1 > is a bit expensive I have come to the conclusion that it is worth every > penny. > > Herb Schoenbohm, KV4FZ > > On 1/21/2016 6:35 PM, Mike Waters wrote: > >> Thank you for sharing your experience, Herb. I have an MFJ-1025 but >> haven't used it since I moved to this QTH 11 years ago. >> >> However, it DID work very well for me in the past. Sometimes, to get it >> to null unwanted line noise, I had to reverse the cable connections, since >> the MFJ phase adjustment does NOT cover the full 360 degrees unless we do. >> >> Did you know about that? I don't recall if that was in the manual. Do you >> remember if you reversed the coax? Just trying to see of that might have >> been why there was such a tremendous improvement between the MFJ and the >> DXE product. >> >> 73, Mike >> www.w0btu.com <http://www.w0btu.com> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Herbert Schoenbohm < >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> >> wrote: >> >> After nearly two years of trying to get some measurable >> improvement with the MFJ-1026 noise cancelling box I finally gave >> up and sold them on E-Bay and purchased a DX-Engineering NCC-1. >> >> >> > _________________ > Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband > _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
