I'm sure qst did their homework on the issue first. Sent from AOL Mobile Mail
-----Original Message----- From: Larry Burke <[email protected]> To: 'Louis Parascondola' <[email protected]>; topband <[email protected]> Sent: Fri, Jan 15, 2016 09:26 AM Subject: RE: Topband: strange propagation Correction.... should have read "non-lawyer". - Larry K5RK -----Original Message----- From: Topband [<a href="mailto:[email protected]?";>mailto:[email protected]</a>] On Behalf Of Larry Burke Sent: Friday, January 15, 2016 8:23 AM To: 'Louis Parascondola'; <a href="mailto:[email protected]";>[email protected]</a> Subject: Re: Topband: strange propagation The RHR lawyers consider a product review in QST by a non-ham as their legal review? How interesting. You said you can get the "ruling" that the RHR guys go by. The QST product review is it?!? - Larry K5RK From: Louis Parascondola [<a href="mailto:[email protected]?";>mailto:[email protected]</a>] Sent: Friday, January 15, 2016 8:10 AM To: <a href="mailto:[email protected]";>[email protected]</a>; <a href="mailto:[email protected]";>[email protected]</a> Subject: Re: Topband: strange propagation Larry, I posted it all an hour ago. -----Original Message----- From: Larry Burke <<a href="mailto:[email protected]";>[email protected]</a>> To: topband <<a href="mailto:[email protected]";>[email protected]</a>> Sent: Fri, Jan 15, 2016 9:03 am Subject: Re: Topband: strange propagation > RHR has lawyers on retainer and I'm sure this has been legally looked at. I can get the ruling they go by. We'll be waiting with bated breath, Lou Parascondola. - Larry K5RK _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - <a href="http://www.contesting.com/_topband"; target="_blank">http://www.contesting.com/_topband</a> _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - <a href="http://www.contesting.com/_topband"; target="_blank">http://www.contesting.com/_topband</a> _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
