Well, that squares up with what I was told...wonder about the WAS award....
________________________________ From: [email protected] <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, December 27, 2015 7:28 AM To: James Rodenkirch Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: Topband: A "valid" QSO???? For DXCC purposes a signal report is not required. In submitting a contact for credit only the call signs of the two stations, DXCC entity, time, date and mode are required. I realized this is only for one award but it is a big one. Best, Steve, NN4T ________________________________ From: "James Rodenkirch" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Cc: "Top Band Contesting" <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, December 27, 2015 8:21:05 AM Subject: Re: Topband: A "valid" QSO???? I believe the gentlemen I conversed with would qualify as holding a position, Joel. I always understood a valid QSO to include receiving the otherham's call sign and the RST but both gentlemen stated an RST wasn't required...think I'lln go back and ask the question again... By the bye - I am referring to a every day, garden variety QSO - not a contest-related Q. ________________________________________ From: Joel Harrison <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, December 27, 2015 5:19 AM To: James Rodenkirch Cc: Top Band Contesting Subject: Re: Topband: A "valid" QSO???? I would be very interested to know "who" at ARRL HQ told you than and holds that position! Is it someone in a position to render an "ARRL position"? I have always been told, have understood and followed the same position Jim has so I'm just curious if there was a "change" somewhere along the way when I may have been taking a nap. I guess exchange and acknowledgement of callsigns constitutes an "exchange of data". Lots of bad storms and heavy QRN here in Arkansas so not much Stew consumption this year. 73 Joel W5ZN > Jim K9YC wrote, "A valid contact is the exchange of callsigns and one > additional piece of information, followed by acknowledgement by both > stations. When running QRP at the limits of propagation, that exchange can > take a while." > > > Where would one find official documentation to support that posit? > > > I see some verbiage stating that in some sort of ARRL operating manual > written by Mark Wilson, Jim....is that your "source of support"? I've > ntalked to ARRL staff who contend one doesn't need anything other than the > exchange of call signs so....I'm just "axin'"!! > > > > 72 de Jim Rodenkirch K9JWV > > _________________ > Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband > www.w5zn.org _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
