Come on Bill ... did i say you did ? >also-- I did not put forth any opinion about ADC or SDR.
Now, you said that you always read well written info from Tom, I didn't see that structure ... Id like to know what SDR was so poor. SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM ... (with a guys voice trying to sound like a old woman) Flying Circus any one? > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: Topband: ADC Overload from MW transmitters > Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 00:52:15 -0500 > > Mike-- > It is obvious that you do not know who Tom is. > and-- the word SPAM followed by six exclamation points IS an expletive. > also-- I did not put forth any opinion about ADC or SDR. > Bill--W4BSG > > -----Original Message----- > From: MIKE DURKIN > Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2015 12:07 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Topband: ADC Overload from MW transmitters > > If i must .... > > Tom never mentioned what type of SDR would be wiped out by moderate signals > ... > > That in its self has three problems ... > > NO filtering? (should this be called -- comparing apples to apples, not > apples to turds) > poor ADC (real cheap soundcard 8bit)? > insanely bad phase error in the nearby transmitter OR the wonderfull SDR > that he built. > > Nearly the entire email was lamented as a setup for a flame war by simply > omitting details ... that is not the actions of a good engineering radio > operator ... hence ... SPAM. -- it was a showing off the effort put into the > SDR i guess. > > And i worry about you Bill .... the word "SPAM" being an expletive in your > vocabulary ... > > I think of many responses on here to ADC overload as this -- > > When dealing with a computer .. the quality of work/info put into it will > have the same ratio that you will get out of it -- qubed. > > how many samples per second are true overload .... and i mean overload -- > not phase error -- if you don't know the difference you really shouldn't put > forth an opinion as truth. > > That video that was posted in this discussion(awhile ago) did point out the > difference quite well and understandable by almost anyone .. check it out, > if not again. > > Not sure if i should really send this .. but, what the hell. > > > > > > From: [email protected] > > To: [email protected]; [email protected] > > Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 17:41:41 -0500 > > Subject: Re: Topband: ADC Overload from MW transmitters > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: MIKE DURKIN > > Sent: Monday, October 19, 2015 10:47 AM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: Topband: ADC Overload from MW transmitters > > > > SPAM !!!!!! > > > > Mike-- > > Can you explain this opinion? > > In my experience, almost anything Tom takes the trouble to publish is well > > thought-out and worth reading. Your expletive puzzles me. > > Bill--W4BSG > > > > > > --- > > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. > > https://www.avast.com/antivirus > > > > _________________ > > Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband > > _________________ > Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband > > > --- > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. > https://www.avast.com/antivirus > _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
