An SDR is better for several things, yes. One advantage is that near-perfect extremely narrow filters can (and do) exist in software. But as a recent thread here* established, there is *NO* SDR that can perform as well as a good ear-brain combo for copying the very weakest of signals buried in the noise. Maybe someday, but the future has not arrived yet. :-)
*I posted a question here and the Linrad reflector on August 4, and received many informative replies. Many can be viewed at lists.contesting.com/_topband/2015-08/msg00008.html 73, Mike www.w0btu.com On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 4:15 PM, JC <[email protected]> wrote: > > It's well know the ability to copy weak signal near strong carriers. > ...Yes the SDR is a better receiver but... > _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
