Okay guys - when email starts getting this specific and personal - the rest of the list is really not interested in it.
Please take this debate off the list. Thanks. Tree On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 8:16 AM, Jim Brown <[email protected]> wrote: > Guy and jim, > > No, I'm not missing anything -- did you miss my words "first > approximation" in my description of the model? That model was a > feasibility study, not intended or accepted (by me, at least) as a > predictor of actual performance of an antenna on a building that we known > nothing more than a few dimensions. You are missing my point, which is > that, depending on the nature of the building roof and structure, a > horizontal antenna MIGHT be a very good one, and is worth trying. > > 73, Jim K9YC > > On Tue,8/11/2015 12:08 PM, Guy Olinger K2AV wrote: > >> No. You'd be missing the essential point which has to do with the "shape" >> of the tool and whether it was remotely suited to the problem. >> > > _________________ > Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband > _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
