Larry I admire your ability to see past the 'smoke and mirrors' and expose the hypocrisy of the ARRL DXCC program. What you have said is true. The ARRL speaks out of both corners of their mouth. There will be others who will object to you exposing the DXCC program and there will be others who wish to change the subject. Some will find the truth unacceptable.
Doug -----Original Message----- > The integrity of the program is irrelevant This one interesting sentence, made in another thread, may be at the root of much of the disagreement expressed in the last few days with regards to DXCC. It does cause one to wonder why the award exists at all. If DXCC only matters to the recipient, why wouldn't their logbook serve the same purpose? For some, it does. What added gratification does that extra piece of paper provide? It's not exactly free. What makes the DXCC countries list so special -- why not use some other list? Why did ARRL go to great pains to make LoTW more challenging than online banking? Why are individuals disqualified from the program if the award only affects *them*? Why do we have card checkers that look for that dot between the "1" and the "8" like the guy looking for a "hanging chad" with a magnifying glass? Finally, what does it mean for the League to call DXCC the "premier operating award" then turn up their hands and basically say "we can't enforce any of this.... it's up to you guys"? Larry K5RK --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
