On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Tom W8JI <[email protected]> wrote: > > I prefer analog detection of weak signals in noise, but I can live with > the K3 when it is adjusted to my liking. I don't like all the menus,
I thought a K3 could be interfaced with a computer (using 3rd-party software) so the user didn't have to touch the menu buttons on the K3. I forget the details or what the name of the software is, but I'm told that's far easier than fiddling with those menus directly on the radio. > As for transmit audio, there isn't a thing wrong with it. > What I heard was bad, was the receive audio on SSB, what's coming out of the speaker connected to it. Are we on the same page? > The K3 does some things virtually no other radio does properly concerning > diversity and DX use, and it has excellent close spaced receiver > performance, so for me there is really no other choice. > When I get another rig, it will likely be a K3 for those and other reasons. But SDRs are getting better and better all the time. 73, Mike www.w0btu.com _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
