Although I saw no 'official' statement about that, I think
the history was something like that:

mod_webapp was indented to be the sole connector for tomcat 4.0.
As it wasn't ready in the needed qualitity, when TC 4.0 was 
released, people started to take mod_jk and integrate it 
with TC 4.

One of the goals for mod_webapp, that I can remember from this 
list, is to enable a better integration between tomcat and apache.
mod_jk has some drawback because there are things you have to 
define at two places.

I don't know a single document that describes this. (This is the 
greatest drawback of mod_webapp).

> -----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Chuck Van Buren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 6. Dezember 2001 21:38
> An: Tomcat Users List
> Betreff: Fw: mod_jserv.so vs mod_webapp.so
> 
> 
> Whoops, I sent that last email without finishing it.  I just 
> realized that
> it didn't sound very good.  Sorry ... =)
> 
> I hadn't gotten any other responses (other than Ralph's) to 
> my emails of
> this morning.  I asked a question about why someone would 
> choose mod_webapp
> over mod_jk (or mod_jserv for that matter).  I was primarily 
> concerned with
> the differences in functionality/features between the two 
> connectors.  I'm
> more concerned about the "why" than the "what."
> 
> I'm interested in making a decision about which of the 
> connectors to use
> based on the amount of functionality (minimum) that I need.  
> If anyone has
> any information or even opinions, feel free to reply.
> 
> Thanks in advance,
> Chuck
> 
> 
> 
> Chuck Van Buren
> Software Developer
> www.adrenaline.com
> w  202-628-4438
> c  202-486-5436
> 
> Adrenaline Group
> 1445 New York Ave
> 4th Floor
> Washington, DC 20005
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Chuck Van Buren" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 3:16 PM
> Subject: Re: mod_jserv.so vs mod_webapp.so
> 
> 
> > The email sent in reply by Ralph was not very useful.  
> (Thanks, Ralph)
> >
> > Chuck Van Buren
> > Software Developer
> > www.adrenaline.com
> > w  202-628-4438
> > c  202-486-5436
> >
> > Adrenaline Group
> > 1445 New York Ave
> > 4th Floor
> > Washington, DC 20005
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Ralph Einfeldt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 11:49 AM
> > Subject: AW: mod_jserv.so vs mod_webapp.so
> >
> >
> > > mod_jserv is not recommended any longer.
> > >
> > > mod_jk is currently the best documented connector for TC 4.0
> > >   http://jakarta.apache.org/~hgomez/ajp13-tc4.0/
> > >
> > > mod_webapp is the connector for the future, but misses some
> > > documentation and as the volume of traffic it caused in this
> > > list indicates, people have more troubles configuring it and
> > > getting it to run.
> > >   http://www.galatea.com/flashguides/apache-tomcat-4-win32.xml
> > >
> > > > -----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht-----
> > > > Von: Chuck Van Buren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 6. Dezember 2001 16:58
> > > > An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Betreff: mod_jserv.so vs mod_webapp.so
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I am setting up Tomcat 4.0.1 with Apache 1.3.1 on Linux 
> (RedHat 7.1).
> > > >
> > > > What are the reasons (issues, improvements, etc) for 
> using mod_webapp
> > > > instead of mod_jserv/mod_jk?
> > > >
> > > > What are the major differences in the configuration of Tomcat
> > > > (and Apache)
> > > > when using mod_webapp instead of mod_jserv?
> > > >
> > > > There's a lot more documentation on mod_jserv and mod_jk than
> > > > there is on
> > > > mod_webapp.  Please feel free to point me to any
> > > > documentation that might
> > > > also help answer these questions.
> > > >
> > > > Chuck
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Chuck Van Buren
> > > > Software Developer
> > > > www.adrenaline.com
> > > > w  202-628-4438
> > > > c  202-486-5436
> > > >
> > > > Adrenaline Group
> > > > 1445 New York Ave
> > > > 4th Floor
> > > > Washington, DC 20005
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > To unsubscribe:   
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > For additional commands:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Troubles with the list:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > For additional commands:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Troubles with the list:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>


--
To unsubscribe:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>



--
To unsubscribe:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to