So does jk_1.2.8, so, for new installs, why would I use it?
The overwhelming answers that I've gotten offline have been don't bother,
so that seems to be the best answer.
Thanks,
-Matt
On Mon, 21 Feb 2005, Nikola Milutinovic wrote:
> Matt wrote:
>
> >If jk2 is abandoned, why would I use it over jk_1.2.8?
> >Platform reasons? Feature reasons? Performance reaosns? Other?
> >Anyone?
>
> Well, for one, it works and I have a ready to run config files.
>
> Nix.
[snip]
Matthew Kozak
Rutgers University-Camden
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**************************************************************************
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -Ben Franklin
**************************************************************************
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
