Hi, Thanks or your suggestion, but I was hoping to avoid having to bounce the context. Also, I have looked at using ANT, but there were a variety of limitations that caused problems. I found I couldn't specify a fileset but could only compile a whole directory and as I said I was hoping to be able to avoid editing the web.xml file and bouncing the context.
My current approach (using a staging server and the precompilation directive) works quite well apart from the problem I detailed below. I am a bit worried that its a showstopper for me. Thanks, Alan -----Original Message----- From: Tim Funk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 19 July 2004 14:54 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: jsp precompiling using staging server This message contains a ant build.xml snippet to precompile all jsps's into a jar. If you implement this - then all your need to do is replace the jar file of precompiled JSP's (1 file) and reload the server. http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=tomcat-user&m=108999588415291&w=2 -Tim Flisch, Alan wrote: > I hope you can help me with this... > > I am trying to devise a precompiling procedure to reduce load on our production > servers. I am precompiling the jsps on a staging server and then copying over the > .jsp files to the appropriate webapp directory and the .java and .class files to the > work directory. It works great the first time (it spots the new JSP and notices a > newer compiled version in the work directory and loads that without any > compilation), but it does not work when I am trying to copy over new versions of > existing JSPs - it continues to serve the old one even though the .jsp file is new > and the .class and .jsp files are new. I'm not sure what it does - it seems that it > must be comparing the modified time of the .jsp file with that of the .class file > and if the class file is newer it does nothing even if they are both newer than the > loaded class file. > > Does anybody have any idea how I can prompt it to load the new class in the work > directory to replace the existing one - is this even possible? > > Any help would be much appreciated. > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Any opinions expressed in this E-mail may be those of the individual and not necessarily the company. This E-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this E-mail in error and that any use or copying is strictly prohibited. If you have received this E-mail in error please notify the beCogent postmaster at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unless expressly stated, opinions in this email are those of the individual sender and not beCogent Ltd. You must take full responsibility for virus checking this email and any attachments. Please note that the content of this email or any of its attachments may contain data that falls within the scope of the Data Protection Acts and that you must ensure that any handling or processing of such data by you is fully compliant with the terms and provisions of the Data Protection Act 1984 and 1998.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
