DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36540>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36540 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-09-30 23:56 ------- I would argue the ackTimeout=15000 should be an indicator that wait for ack =true, do you really need two flags to say the same thing? To simplify the implementation, I would use the following logic, and remove the "waitForAck" flag all together. ackTimeout > 0 - wait for ack true, and time out set ackTimeout = 0 - wait for ack false ackTimeout = -1 - wait for ack true, no timeout -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
