DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUGĀ· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36569>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED ANDĀ· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36569 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-09-09 18:21 ------- On further examination, I think what you are right in essence ... the real problem is that acegi is providing an invalid URL to Tomcat. This raises the question, however, about whether sendRedirect shouldn't check it's input and provide an informative error message so that errors like this are caught early rather than much later. Also, the resulting access after the invalid location is used could provide a better message. The GET message that begins the transaction looks somehting like this: GET http://host.domain.tld/usrl?arg1=first second&arg2=foo HTTP/1.1 Tomcat interprets this as meaning that the protocol is "second&arg2=foo". What should really happen is that Tomcat should generate a 505 invalid request. Changing the error checking is more important than it might appear to be due to the widespread use of acegi. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]