DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36541>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36541 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-09-09 13:28 ------- (In reply to comment #66) > http://java.sun.com/j2se/javadoc/writingapispecs/index.html#top-level That reference is invalid in the context of this bug report. I read it to be a hyperthetical example of what to put inside javadoc information. Nothing concrete to under pin all Java programming design. My comments fallback to what is written (and not written) into the documentation for the HashMap implementation that TC has elected to use for the job. It does not say you call get() while you are also doing a put() (when the put() may cause internal re-arangement), it explicitly warns you of this problem and as we have no way knowing if the put will cause a rearrangment to achieve TCs goal of robustness we have to synchronize our usage. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
