DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36293>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36293 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-22 18:37 ------- Yes, but how many ClassLoaders keep a cache around forever with no maximum size or idle detection? At the very least you should be using SoftReferences here, which have been around since JDK 1.2 and have been specifically designated for caches. Webapps are rarely short-lived which makes this problem even worse. I would be perfectly fine with SoftReferences with no configuration settings. Can you make this modification? -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
