On 7/27/05, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > All, > > Following up on my offer to trial a Subversion migration using Watchdog, I > started to think that it would be a good idea to have an idea of what we want > our eventual Subversion layout to look like so we could target the Watchdog > conversion to that layout and save rework at a later date.
Let me know whenever you want to migrate it into the test/live repo. I'm doing lots of the SVN migrations nowadays. > Once we have agreement on this, I'll put in a request for the Watchdog > migration and also kick off a discussion with infra on how best to go about > the overall migration. It might be the case that they do a default migration > for each module and we (I am happy to do it) move the directories around > afterwards. Probably a mixture of both. Some of the migration bits will be easy, but things like splitting the tags and branches automatically into their own versioned directories would involve a post-migration script and I or you can do them by hand. > Finally, my intention with the migration of Watchdog is to see what, if any, > performance differences there are between CVS and SVN. If there is no major > performance hit moving to SVN, great, we can migrate the other modules > whenever we choose. If there is a performance hit, we will have some hard > evidence on which to base our decision about how to move forward. We can start whenever you'd like. Hen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
