DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31794>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31794 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|INVALID | ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-06-02 00:03 ------- (Sorry Yoavs for CC'ing, I have to contradict the verdict and hope someone else than our hurried friend will handle this...) The 400 status code can have and should forward to a page handler if any. It sure has no mapping, but doesn't need so. The url is in the web.xml plain simply. I have seen the code for myself, and even if it is not easy to refactor the oversight, this is the spec. The argument given is one from an implementation perspective and has no weight given the spec wasn't respected. The limitation of tomcat must be fixed. I'm about to try this 5.5.x without 1.5... Last time, I checked, it wasn't working. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
