Re: APR support

[Mladen Turk]

Remy Maucherat wrote:

Hi,

After optimizing JNI invocations with NIO, I got the benchmark results I wanted from APR. The performance of the HTTP APR connector is now the same as the regular HTTP connector (at least on Windows)

Here are the results for Linux:

Server SLES9/amd64 with sp1.
Client RHEL4/amd64.
Connecet with Gigabit ethernet via crossconnect cable.

Tested only static content.
One interesting thing is that CPU usage for Tomcat is
around 50% for 1m file, while when using APR with sendfile
enabled it is around 23%. On window it's even lower.

Not sure weather all the attachment will pass.
If they don't I'll put them somewhere.

One interesting thing is that for small files (1k) the httpd
is two times slower then regular Tomcat.

Regards,
Mladen.

std100k.txt
Description: application/octet-string

apr1k.txt

Description: application/octet-string


apr1m.txt

Description: application/octet-string


apr10k.txt

Description: application/octet-string


apr100k.txt

Description: application/octet-string


httpd1k.txt

Description: application/octet-string


httpd1m.txt

Description: application/octet-string


httpd10k.txt

Description: application/octet-string


httpd100k.txt

Description: application/octet-string


std1k.txt

Description: application/octet-string


std1m.txt

Description: application/octet-string


std10k.txt

Description: application/octet-string
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]