At 05:08 PM 5/9/2005, Jean-Jacques Clar wrote: >I built and tried mod_jk against 2.0.52 and 2.1-dev. However, in these two >cases it was not tested as for 2.0.54. Stress tests were done against Tomcat >4.1.30, validation against 4.1.31. For 1.3.33, I am sorry to admit that I did >not build JK and is not currently planning to do it.I currently have access to >these resources. What else do you want me to do? I will not and could never be >able to cover this incredible set of combinations.Next time I will put more >details in my report, but I was reporting a fact not more, not less.But from >what I could do, 1.2.12 is good.
Thank you Jean-Jacques - narrows down the scope of what I need to test. Of course the handful here will never test with any of the breadth of options available, it was my point :) I'm in a good position to have my staff beat on jk .12 / Apache 1.3 tomcat 4.1 and 5.0. I'll focus on that since the Apache2 side seems well covered. Bill --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
