+1

BTW, did there is provision to reduce search to only *.mydomain.com ?


2005/5/3, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
> The performance impact is not that big.  If it was a configurable option,
> e.g. enableAliasWildcardMatching, turned off by default, I'd be OK with it.
> 
> Yoav
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 10:04 AM
> > To: Tomcat Developers List
> > Subject: Re: Code Submission - Wild Card Aliases
> >
> > George Sexton wrote:
> > > I have completed the coding in o.a.t.u.http.mapper.Mapper to implement
> > > wild-card aliases.
> > >
> > > If a request for a host is made, and that host is not found, the code
> > tests
> > > the host and aliases list and looks for wild-cards.
> > >
> > > So, a host name of www.mydomain.com would match an alias of
> > *.mydomain.com.
> > > This additional level of testing is only done if the the presented host
> > name
> > > is not found in the standard host list. Once a host is found via wild-
> > card,
> > > it is added to the standard host list. Subsequent requests for that host
> > > name will find it via the standard search mechanism.
> > >
> > > As part of the conversion, I re-worked the test harness code and
> > expanded it
> > > to be a lot more complete. The output of the new test harness with the
> > > unmodified Mapper code matches identically the output of the modified
> > > mapper. IOW, I'm 99% confident that the behavior of the Mapper matches
> > the
> > > old Mapper.
> > >
> > > The time differential between the two runs is around 500ms over 1
> > million
> > > iterations. I.E. the original code runs in 8000 ms for 1 million
> > iterations
> > > of the testing code, while the new code takes 8500ms. The new code adds
> > > approximately 0.05 % to the time for a lookup.
> > >
> > > I am running the modified mapper code with 5.5.9 on an installation that
> > has
> > > 40 hosts configured and it seems to be working correctly.
> > >
> > > I'd really appreciate it if a committer would get this added to the
> > source
> > > tree.
> > >
> > > The complete modified Mapper.java file can be downloaded from:
> > >
> > > http://www.mhsoftware.com/~gsexton/Mapper.java
> > >
> > > If a decision is made to reject this patch, I'd appreciate knowing why.
> > If
> > > there's something wrong from a coding or style perspective, I'd be happy
> > to
> > > fix things.
> >
> > -1 for lower performance and questionable use case.
> > (I didn't get the patch, but I don't really wish to)
> >
> > Rémy
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to