billbarker 2005/04/23 21:27:42
Modified: jk/java/org/apache/jk/common ChannelNioSocket.java Log: Give up on switching between blocking/non-blocking Sockets, also move
the Accecpt into the Poller instead of its own thread.
This is still very much experimental, and nobody should even dream of using it in production.
Testing on Windows, it's very flakey. On Solaris, it's stable enough, but ChannelSocket is about 25% faster.
Does it do about the same of behavior as the APR endpoint ? (I didn't try it - I run Windoze for my dev, BTW ;) )
I would like AJP and HTTP to share more code. Do you think that NIO is a better choice, or should it remain an experiment ? To me, it seems less mature, robust and portable (the most annoying problem probably being that to get bugfixes and feature updates, you need to upgrade the JVM), but I don't have a whole lot of experience.
Rémy
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
