Apologies if I missed it, but I've seen responses to Yoav's and Peter's posts, but I have yet to see anything about Jess' NIO question. Since I agree with his observations, I was wondering if a reponse was in the works? (I assume it'll say something like, "Yes, a Java NIO solution could very well provide enough improvements, but APR is already written, fully-established, and field-tested.")
Just curious. Jay Vertical Technology Group http://www.vtgroup.com/ -----Original Message----- From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2005 1:53 PM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: Tomcat and APR Peter Lin wrote: > if I have time this weekend, I'll try to run the same benchmarks on > the latest code. > > is it included in the nightly build? if not, can someone post a build > for me to benchmark on my system? We're going to have to resolve the issue I mentioned with keepalive before doing serious benchmarking. If you're on Linux, then it should be easy to test: build APR (I'll let Mladen precise any version requirement), and then build the native stuff in j-t-c/jni. Then make sure both libs are available to the JVM. APR is more portable than certified JVMs at the moment, although gcj-4 looks to be a big improvement (although not certified). Then use protocol="org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11AprProtocol" on the connector element. Rémy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
