Remy Maucherat wrote:
Hi,
Here's a new draft with the necessary updates.
I suppose this needs to be sent to the PMC for approval. If this draft is ok, I will send it there.
Then there are infrastructure taks: - renaming mailing lists
Is that just keeping both lists and moving them up the domain hierarchy, or is there a move to
change the list names while we're at it?
I have no idea how infrastructure would do it, but it's part of the process.
- moving CVS - new DNS and virtual host
To summarize things: - I will be the proposed first PMC chair
Lucky you :-) Everyone else I hope thanks you for taking this on.
- PMC chairs will serve for one year, and cannot serve consecutive one year terms (shouldn't this be put in the resolution text ? - if so, please help writing it, as I can't write ASF resolution compliant language)
In a conventional organization I think this would be in a separate by-laws document, but I'm not up-to-date on Apache organization. If it belongs in the resolution, I will take a stab at implementing a wording that will be perceived as appropriate and efficacious :-)
That makes sense to me that it would be a project level rule.
- although the ASF infrastructure is quite aggressive in pushing Subversion, I find it harder to work with than CVS at the moment (including crucial - for me - revision graphs, and better tool support); as a result, I think I would prefer keeping CVS for the time being
I agree - I'd prefer to stay on CVS, at least until the tool support is more widespread (e.g., Eclipse doesn't ship with a SubVersion plug-in yet, though there are a few available).
They'd have to improve a lot very fast (from what was posted, CVS at the ASF dies at the end of the year) ;)
Rémy
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
