DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33474>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33474 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-10 16:43 ------- I have to disagree with marking this as invalid. It _is_ marked as an enhancement and it would be much easier to tell when or if it is implemented with this for tracking. I couldn't find any other dependencies on the listener port. The only other issue is making the bind happen in the calling thread inside of start() and not in the listener's thread. I don't know why you would continue processing the cluster (or even starting another thread in this case) if you can't get a required resource, even if it may save a little time. I didn't see anything required for the bind that could block for any long period of time, so putting it in the calling thread wouldn't do any harm. If there are any "dependencies" outside of that, that's non-OO and bad news. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
