DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33453>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33453 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-09 00:46 ------- Although not allowed to vote I have an opinion: The dynamic update feature for JSPs comes from the need to dynamically manage content without a heavy weight administrative action. But every now and then one has to roll back a change. With static content you would just put back the original files. It would be very nice, if it would work the same way with JSPs, especially because that's unsually the unplanned case (roll back) where you need to have a simple procedure. I know, you could touch the old file. Myself I always tell Sysadmins to make backup copies and roll back file changes with "cp -p", so that the files keep their original timestamp, which is a nice low-level approximation of checksums. Any higher level tool (like CVS) will most liekely also roll back including file timestamps. There seems to be very little risk in the change and some not neglectable benefit. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
