The manager would be wrong if:

a) we had a consistent way of handling the ROOT context
b) the agreed consistent way to reference ROOT was ""

I am not aware of a) and from a user perspective "/" seems to make more sense for b)

At least at present the docs agree with the actual behaviour.

Mark

Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hi,
IT might be the manager that's wrong.  When editing server.xml or
context.xml files for those Tomcat versions, users should use path="" and
not path="/".  The latter leads to significant failures.

Yoav

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 4:30 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28867] - Documentation mentions zero-length
string for root context path instead of "/"


I did a quick test (on TC4 and TC5) before changing the docs.

http://localhost:8080/manager/reload?path=/
returns
OK - Reloaded application at context path /

http://localhost:8080/manager/reload?path=
returns
FAIL - Invalid context path  was specified

Mark

Yoav Shapira wrote:

Hi,
I thought the docs were right, path="" for the ROOT, not path="/".  And
therefore I thought this was an invalid bug report.  Was I wrong?

Yoav

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 4:11 PM
To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28867] - Documentation mentions zero-length
string for root context path instead of "/"


DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG.
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28867>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND.
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28867


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

          What    |Removed                     |Added


----------------------------------------------------------------------------

            Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
        Resolution|                            |FIXED




------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-11 22:11

-------

Fixed in CVS for 4.1.x and 5.5.x

Thansk for the report and the patch (I actually committed a variation).




--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to