William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > Silly Question - doesn't this proposal fit better > in the commons project than Tomcat? >
Perhaps, but the guys that are interested in both c and Java live inside J-T-C :).
And since it will be buildable independent of any connector code, it could be moved to commons or even apr.
> The reason I suggest this is that we have .pkg and .rpm > folks supporting standardized apr 0.9 / 1.x installs.
Well that's OK, but the apr-java consists of two parts: native library and .jar file, requires Java SDK installed, etc.
Mladen.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
