On further analysis it seems that StandardSession is only constructed by ManagerBase and indirectly from SimpleTcpReplicationManager via the ReplicatedSession subclass.

Given that SimpleTcpReplicationManager is mutually exclusive of PersistentManager, it would appear I should move my StandardSession changes into a new PersistentSession class and move my ManagerBase changes into PersistentManagerBase.

Which portions of my changes woulud be objectionable in this case? [Yes, the Request change would still be necessary to prevent the chance of requests randomly getting their sessions passivated and recycle after they findSession() but before access().]

--
Jess Holle

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to