DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31914>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31914

Memory leak when using Jsp tags (JspWriter)

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|WONTFIX                     |



------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-10-29 09:57 -------
Hi,

it would be very nice if you could explain what
You are meaning with the words "quite evil".

The given example is not agains the spec, I can
send You the whole WAR-File (4k only) where You can reproduce
the problem in 2 minutes. I copied the example from 
2 JSP books, I only modified it to reproduce our problem. 

The memory is not freed if we are creating a big 
body content and after 100 user 1 GB of data is in
use without any change to free it. 
Is it not allowed by the spec to produce a big body content (?)
or what is the problem ?

The gc commands and session.invalide() commands are only
added for the test.

Again: The problem are only the statements:
Instead of the println() You could use also
something else (maybe a tag which creates the output).


<html>
<p>BEFORE <p>
<dbs:SelectMemTest>
  <p>inner before <%=amount%>
  <%
    for (int i = 0; i < ii; i++) {
      out.println("<br><p>"+i+" and next");
    }
  %>
  <p>inner after
</dbs:SelectMemTest>
<p>after<p>


The rest is only for analysing help.

Thank You for the amount of time You
are spending and Your helpful comments
so far.



Klaus

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to