DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31191>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31191 Better changelog/migration documentation ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-13 13:57 ------- Frankly, that is a joke. You guys are the only ones around that release an alpha release without specifying the word "alpha" anywhere around it. None of the news sources that reported on it mentioned the word alpha either. Furthermore "quality releases" means different things to different people. You should replace it by "Latest stable versions" if that's what you mean. Lastly, when someone reports a problem with the documentation, labeling them as a whiner does not a product improve. Alphas, betas or anything else, my point stands: you need better changelog documentation. When backwards-compatibility is broken -- due to changed package names, command syntax, etc -- you should document it so your end-users know about it. That's it, I'm off. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
